You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Comment
  • Open Access

Open questions: why are babies rarely born with cancer?

BMC Biology201816:129

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0601-9

  • Published:

Abstract

Childhood cancer is fundamentally a disease of dysregulated development. Why does it rarely occur during the fetal period, a time of enormous growth and development?

Cancer is the leading cause of disease-related morbidity and mortality during childhood. Fundamentally, childhood cancers are diseases of dysregulated development. So why does cancer rarely form during the most intense period of human development? The prenatal period is a time of enormous growth, with the length of a human embryo increasing from 3 mm at 3-weeks gestation to 90 mm at 12-weeks gestation, and the fetus growing to ~ 500 mm by birth. This represents a ~ 170-fold increase in size through a massive expansion of cellular proliferation during prenatal development. And yet, congenital cancer—defined as cancer emerging during the prenatal period up to the first 3 months of postnatal life—is rare, accounting for only 1–2% of all pediatric cancers with a prevalence of one case in 12,500–27,500 live births [1]. By the middle of the first year of life, however, this period of exemption wanes and cancer incidence sharply increases.

Is congenital cancer rare because time and environmental exposure are required to accumulate the mutations that drive malignancy? Several lines of evidence suggest that the answer is no. First, pediatric cancers exhibit a low mutational burden relative to adult cancers [2, 3], so low that in fact a significant proportion (10%) of childhood cancers exhibit no mutations at all [2, 3]. These genomically silent childhood cancers appear to be epigenetically driven [4], but how these cancer cells arrive at a malignant state remains to be fully elucidated. This low mutational burden suggests that childhood cancer initiation does not necessarily require the accumulation of multiple oncogenic mutations. Second, in several examples of childhood cancer the driver mutation occurs prenatally, but the cancer does not emerge until a later timepoint in childhood development. For example, leukemogenic mutations can be retrospectively identified in the neonatal blood spots of young children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), indicating that the key mutation was present prenatally but cancer initiation was delayed until later in infancy [5]. Thus, in the prenatal period the critical mutation may be present, cellular proliferation is at a peak, the tissue microenvironment is rich with growth signals, and yet tumors only rarely occur.

Is a protective mechanism at play? Do cells in the prenatal and perinatal period of development exist in a cellular state less permissive to transformation? If this speculation is correct, understanding the manner in which fetal cells typically guard against malignancy could elucidate novel therapeutic strategies applicable to cancer prevention and therapy at all ages.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MM wrote the article. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Stanford University, 265 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, USA

References

  1. Moore SW, Satge D, Sasco AJ, Zimmermann A, Plaschkes J. The epidemiology of neonatal tumours. Report of an international working group. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19(7):509–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Grobner SN, Worst BC, Weischenfeldt J, Buchhalter I, Kleinheinz K, Rudneva VA, et al. The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers. Nature. 2018;555(7696):321–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ma X, Liu Y, Liu Y, Alexandrov LB, Edmonson MN, Gawad C, et al. Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 paediatric leukaemias and solid tumours. Nature. 2018;555(7696):371–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayliss J, Mukherjee P, Lu C, Jain SU, Chung C, Martinez D, et al. Lowered H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation define poorly prognostic pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas. Sci Trans Med. 2016;8(366):366ra161.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gale KB, Ford AM, Repp R, Borkhardt A, Keller C, Eden OB, et al. Backtracking leukemia to birth: identification of clonotypic gene fusion sequences in neonatal blood spots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(25):13950–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement