- Research article
- Open Access
The scavenging of superoxide radicals promotes apoptosis induced by a novel cell-permeable fusion protein, sTRAIL:FeSOD, in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-resistant leukemia cells
© Tang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 29 January 2011
- Accepted: 19 March 2011
- Published: 19 March 2011
Many cancer cells develop resistance to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis, necessitating combination with chemotherapy, and normal cells manifest side effects due to the combined treatment regimen of TRAIL and chemotherapeutic drugs. A novel cancer therapy utilizing TRAIL is thus urgently needed.
In this study, we exploited TRAIL receptor-mediated endocytosis for the first time to produce a cell-permeable molecule, soluble forms of recombinant TRAIL:iron superoxide dismutase (sTRAIL:FeSOD), which possesses sTRAIL-induced apoptotic ability and FeSOD antioxidant activity. The FeSOD component was rapidly introduced into the cell by sTRAIL and intracellular superoxide radical (O2-), which have been implicated as potential modulators of apoptosis in cancer cells, was eliminated, resulting in a highly reduced cellular environment. The decrease in cellular O2-, which was accompanied by a brief accumulation of H2O2 and downregulation of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) and cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein, sensitized K562 leukemia cells and human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. The low H2O2 levels protected human LO2 hepatocytes from sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis despite downregulation of p-Akt. We also obtained evidence that the lack of response to sTRAIL:FeSOD in normal T cells occurred because sTRAIL:FeSOD shows much stronger shifts of redox state in erythroleukemia (K562) and HL-60 cells compared to that in normal T cells. K562 and HL-60 cells underwent sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis without the dysfunction of mitochondria.
The fusion protein overcomes the inability of FeSOD to permeate the cell membrane, exhibits synergistic apoptotic effects on K562 and HL-60 cells and demonstrates minimal toxicity to normal T cells and the normal liver cell line LO2, indicating its potential value for the treatment of leukemia.
- K562 Cell
- Reactive Oxygen Species Level
- Trail Receptor
- Mitochondrial Apoptotic Pathway
Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a potent anticancer therapeutic agent that induces apoptotic cell death in cancer cells , regardless of P53 status. TRAIL is therefore a promising cancer therapeutic agent, especially for chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-resistant cancer cells . Preclinical studies in mice and nonhuman primates with soluble forms of recombinant TRAIL (sTRAIL) have shown strong tumoricidal activity in xenografted tumor models without apparent toxic side effects [3, 4]. However, certain TRAIL preparations have been shown to be toxic to human hepatocytes and keratinocytes, which may be responsible for the considerable hepatotoxicity or fulminant hepatic failure observed in human trials [5, 6]. In addition, TRAIL resistance has been observed in many cancer cells [7–9]. Thus, understanding the exact molecular determinants of TRAIL resistance and developing strategies to overcome such resistance without killing normal cells are extremely important prerequisites for the successful deployment of TRAIL as a therapeutic agent.
Several different kinds of chemotherapy drugs are used in combination with TRAIL to sensitize TRAIL-resistant cancer cells, and many reports have combined recombinant TRAIL with standard anticancer therapies to induce synergistic tumor cell apoptosis [10, 11]. However, there is evidence that some normal human cells are sensitive to apoptosis after treatment by TRAIL in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs [12, 13]. Furthermore, mutation or deletion of p53 occurs in more than half of all human tumors, and Akt is frequently hyperactive in cancer cells. Both of these alterations play a prominent role in cell resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Edwin et al.  reported a recombinant fusion protein, single-chain variable fragment 425 (scFv425):sTRAIL, that combined the tumoricidal effect of epidermal growth factor receptor signal inhibition with target cell-restricted apoptosis induction, hence showing promising antitumor activity. Thus, in recent years, biological mechanism-based cancer therapeutic strategies that may exert enhanced antitumor activity and high tumor specificity have attracted much more attention because of the unfavorable side effects of chemoradiotherapy and the resistance of many tumor cells to chemo- or radiotherapy [2, 15].
Antioxidants have long been used for the treatment of cancer, especially in combination with other anticancer drugs . Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a type of potent antioxidant enzyme that suppresses the growth of various cancer cells by removing superoxide radicals (O2-) , which are critical in different stages of carcinogenesis. However, owing to its large molecular weight, SOD cannot enter the cell to exert its effects. To overcome this deficiency, a liposome can be used to enclose SOD, allowing it to enter cells . Additionally, we have previously shown that a fusion of SOD with scFv was able to permeate the cell membrane via receptor-mediated endocytosis and was able to then inhibit cell proliferation through the Akt/p27kip1 pathway . However, neither of these approaches effectively inhibits cancer cell proliferation, and therefore engineering SOD to permeate the cell membrane and exercise its powerful cytotoxic effects is key to its clinical application.
Akt regulates the transactivation of antiapoptotic molecules such as cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIPL), X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein and the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL) [20–22]. Furthermore, Akt is dephosphorylated at Thr308 (converting it into the inactive form) at reduced levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) , making SOD an attractive therapeutic agent for sensitizing cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Because TRAIL can be internalized via receptor-mediated endocytosis , we hypothesized that iron superoxide dismutase (FeSOD) could be internalized with sTRAIL to reduce the level of intracellular O2-. Here we cloned and coexpressed sTRAIL (114 to 281 aa) and FeSOD, as well as a fusion protein containing both, to determine whether the resultant fused protein possessed dual activity and could exert a synergistic effect on cancer cells. We observed sTRAIL:FeSOD to engage the TRAIL receptors (TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2), resulting in internalization of the receptor and ligand. Once inside the cell, sTRAIL:FeSOD scavenged intracellular O2-, which then influenced the TRAIL-induced apoptosis pathway.
Production of sTRAIL:FeSOD
Sensitization of K562 and HL-60 cell lines to sTRAIL:FeSOD
As described above, many tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL because of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) upregulation. Recently, we discovered that FeSOD can downregulate the levels of p-Akt , and therefore we were interested in determining whether FeSOD could cooperate with TRAIL to enhance the killing of tumor cells. To address this question, the TRAIL-resistant erythroleukemia (K562) cells and human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells  were used to detect the antitumor ability of sTRAIL:FeSOD. Compared with sTRAIL:mFeSOD or sTRAIL, K562 and HL-60 cells demonstrated significantly less viability after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, and their antitumor activity increased significantly in a sTRAIL:FeSOD dose-dependent manner. The decrease in cell viability was ascribed to apoptosis as demonstrated by anti-annexin V antibody and propidium iodide (PI) staining (Figures 1D and 1E), strongly suggesting that sTRAIL and FeSOD synergistically induced apoptosis in the TRAIL-resistant K562 and HL-60 tumor cells. In contrast to the effect in these two cell lines, sTRAIL:FeSOD did not sensitize freshly isolated peripheral blood T cells to death induced by apoptosis (Figure 1F). As TRAIL induces apoptosis in normal human hepatocytes, the LO2 cells were also treated as a control group. Interestingly, the LO2 cells, which are extremely sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis , were less sensitive to sTRAIL:FeSOD (Figure 1G).
Rapid internalization of sTRAIL:FeSOD
The ability of sTRAIL:FeSOD to enter the cell is the basis for the synergistic effect of sTRAIL and FeSOD. After incubation with labeled sTRAIL:FeSOD for 5 minutes, the K562 cells began to show fluorescence (Figure 2A). Internalization increased at 15 minutes (Figure 2B) with marked fluorescence and fluorescence was even stronger by 30 minutes (Figure 2C). As the cell surface-associated ligand was stripped by acid washing, the internal fluorescence of the cells could be determined. Uptake of sTRAIL:FeSOD was completely blocked by hypertonic medium in LO2 cells (Figure 2D). Quantitative data detected by flow cytometry indicated internalization rates for FeSOD, sTRAIL:mFeSOD and sTRAIL:FeSOD of 1.38%, 82.56% and 85.43%, respectively (Figures 2E to 2H). Internalization of sTRAIL:FeSOD in HL-60 and LO2 cells, which underwent the same treatment processes as did the K562 cells, were confirmed by LSCM. However, normal T cells showed low fluorescence signals, which may be related to the minimal expression of TRAIL death receptors  (data not shown).
sTRAIL:FeSOD neutralizes free radical O2-and reduces ROS
SOD is well known to induce H2O2 production during O2- scavenging, and therefore we monitored the changes in H2O2, O2-, ROS and glutathione (GSH) levels after treating the cells with sTRAIL:FeSOD. As shown in Figures 3C to 3F, H2O2 levels increased 1 or 2 hours after administration of sTRAIL:FeSOD in K562 and HL-60 cells in comparison with the levels in LO2 and T cells. However, at 3 hours after treatment, we observed that H2O2 levels had declined almost to normal levels. As compared with sTRAIL:mFeSOD, sTRAIL:FeSOD induced a notably more significant decrease in cellular ROS and O2- fluorescence intensities and a marked rise in GSH levels in the K562 and HL-60 cells (Figures 3C to 3F). Figure 3G shows that the redox status in LO2 cells changed, but not as strongly as they did in the cancer cells or in the sTRAIL:mFeSOD-treated LO2 cells. As shown in Figure 3H, normal T cells maintained a stable redox status, which may explain why they did not undergo sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis. Figure 3I shows that sTRAIL:mFeSOD-induced apoptosis in LO2 cells was accompanied by a rapid increase in ROS levels. The graph also shows that 3 hours after sTRAIL:FeSOD treatment in the two leukemia cell lines, ROS levels did not increase along with the decrease in H2O2, suggesting that H2O2 was broken down by the cellular antioxidant defenses rather than giving rise to highly reactive hydroxyl radicals .
sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis does not involve the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway
sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced death is dependent on caspase-8
The internalization of FeSOD is indispensable for sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis
First, we examined the expression of TRAIL receptors and whether treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD led to elevated surface expression of DR4 and DR5. No major differences were found in the expression of either DR4 or DR5 after 6 hours of sTRAIL:FeSOD treatment (Figure 5F). To determine which receptor is involved in the death induced by sTRAIL:FeSOD and to discern whether the uptake of sTRAIL:FeSOD is receptor-dependent, we then performed an experiment in which we added blocking antibodies against DR5 and/or DR4 for 1.5 hours prior to sTRAIL:FeSOD exposure . Figure 5G shows that blocking with DR5 or DR4 antibody partially protected the K562 and HL-60 cells from cell death, whereas the antibody against DR5 had a more pronounced protective effect on sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis than did the antibody against DR4. No significant apoptosis was noted when blocking with both anti-TRAIL receptor antibodies. These results indicate that the sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced death signaling in the two cell lines depends on DR5 and DR4. After blocking with antibodies against DR5 and/or DR4, the internalization of the fusion protein mirrored the apoptosis results, showing death receptor dependence. There was minimal uptake of sTRAIL:FeSOD when pretreated with both anti-TRAIL receptor antibodies (data not shown), demonstrating the endocytosis to be receptor-mediated.
To provide evidence for the synergistic effect of sTRAIL and FeSOD, K562 and HL-60 cells were treated in hypertonic medium containing sTRAIL:FeSOD, conditions under which internalization of FeSOD was inhibited. Figure 5G shows that the sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis drastically declined in the hypertonic medium, demonstrating FeSOD to be indispensable for sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis. The confirmed internalization of sTRAIL:mFeSOD into K562 and HL-60 cells (Figure 2G) and the indistinguishable cell death in the two cell lines after treatment with sTRAIL:mFeSOD (Figures 1D and 1E) further prove the necessity for FeSOD to be internalized to allow for sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis.
A brief accumulation of H2O2is involved in sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis
We observed that the elevated H2O2 levels lasted about 2 hours in K562 and HL-60 cells after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD (Figures 3C and 3D). H2O2 has been reported to have a direct effect on caspase-8 activation, and therefore we investigated whether H2O2 was involved in sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis. To that end, cells were treated with sTRAIL:FeSOD in the presence or absence of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) . After pretreatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD for 0, 1 or 2 hours, the addition of NAC partially reduced sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis (Figure 5H). When the cells were pretreated with sTRAIL:FeSOD for more than 3 hours, NAC did not show any significant inhibitory effect on sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced cell death. Thus, the results indicate that the production of H2O2 during O2- scavenging contributed to sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis and that caspase-8 activation by H2O2 occur within the first 2 hours after sTRAIL:FeSOD treatment. To further assess the role of H2O2 produced during O2- scavenging in sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis, we examined the apoptosis induced by sTRAIL:FeSOD after eliminating intracellular O2- by pretreating HL-60 and K562 cells with NAC for 24 hours (Figures 5I to 5K). Because of the prescavenging of O2-, there was little substrate for FeSOD, which caused the H2O2 to remain at a very low level during the treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD. Figure 5I shows that cell death was reduced. These data suggest that H2O2 plays an important role in sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis.
Downregulation of p-Akt and c-FLIPLpromotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HL-60 and K562 cells
Low levels of H2O2protect LO2 cells from sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis
The downregulation of p-Akt and c-FLIPL was also observed in LO2 cells (Figure 6C), but not in normal T cells (data not shown). It was not immediately apparent why TRAIL sensitivity did not occur in LO2 cells. LO2 cells are type II, and TRAIL-induced apoptosis can be blocked by caspase-9 inhibition in these cells (Figure 7D). The results presented in Figure 3I and Figures 4A and 4B also suggest that sTRAIL-induced apoptosis in LO2 cells was dependent on mitochondria. Caspase-9 activity was low, and mitochondria remained polarized after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, which inhibits the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Therefore, we hypothesized that the low levels of H2O2 prevented sTRAIL:FeSOD from converting LO2 into type I cells, which are characterized by high caspase-8 activity. To test this hypothesis, RNA interference transfection was performed to depress catalase expression in the LO2 cells, and the H2O2 levels were found to be much higher than those in the control group after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD (Figure 7E). High caspase-8 activity and apoptosis were induced by sTRAIL:FeSOD (Figures 7F and 7G) in the catalase-deficient LO2 cells. On the basis of these experimental data, LO2 cells are not converted into type I cells after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD. On the contrary, sTRAIL:FeSOD not only depressed caspase-9 activity but also maintained caspase-8 activity below a critical threshold because of the low H2O2 levels, rendering the LO2 cells insensitive to sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis. Thus, without the accumulation of H2O2, downregulation of p-Akt and c-FLIPL was insufficient to activate enough caspase-8 to sensitize LO2 to TRAIL-induced apoptosis at a low level of oxidative stress.
Here we describe a novel therapeutic approach for treating cancer using the new cell-permeable fusion protein sTRAIL:FeSOD. The effects of sTRAIL and sTRAIL:FeSOD on apoptosis in LO2 cells in hyperosmotic medium did not show significant differences, suggesting that the FeSOD domain does not change the oligomerization state of sTRAIL (Figures 1B and 1C). When engaging the TRAIL receptors (TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2), the trimeric sTRAIL:FeSOD triggered the TRAIL-induced apoptotic signaling pathway and simultaneously permeated the cell membrane via the receptor-mediated endocytic pathway. Movement throughout the cytoplasm provided FeSOD with the opportunity to scavenge O2- originating from the mitochondria. Once sTRAIL:FeSOD engaged the TRAIL receptors, TRAIL-induced apoptosis signaling was triggered, seemingly prior to the elimination of intracellular O2-. However, in the current study, the brief accumulation of H2O2 and the downregulation of p-Akt occurred rapidly enough to enhance the sensitivity of K562 and HL-60 cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. The internalization of sTRAIL:FeSOD was rapid (Figure 2) and triggered TRAIL-induced apoptosis signaling and the elimination of intracellular O2- to occur nearly simultaneously. In addition, it has been suggested that Fas-associated protein with death domain and caspase-8 are not recruited soon enough because of the long delay in death-inducing signaling complex assembly in type II cells . Thus, FeSOD had sufficient time to scavenge intracellular O2- and then influence the course of TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
The inhibition of H2O2 accumulation or the overexpression of c-FLIPL partially suppressed sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis, and thus we infer that H2O2 and p-Akt affect caspase-8 activity via different pathways. Constitutive phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt activity has been demonstrated to be one of the most effective antiapoptotic survival pathways in TRAIL-resistant cells, and therefore decreasing p-Akt levels is an important mechanism of averting TRAIL resistance. Tumor cells containing an activating somatic mutation in PI3K are relatively resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis [32, 33]. After treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, p-Akt was downregulated in three cell lines (Figures 6A to 6C), depressing c-FLIPL expression . However, the LO2 cells responded little to the fusion protein, in contrast to the synergistic apoptosis in TRAIL-resistant K562 and HL-60 cells . The downregulation of Akt activity by LY294002 promoted TRAIL cytotoxicity in LO2 cells (Figure 6D), implying that low oxidative stress induced by FeSOD inhibited TRAIL-induced apoptosis in the LO2 cells. The results of the present study suggest that differences in caspase-8 activity determine the different cellular effects of sTRAIL:FeSOD on the indicated cells based on the interruption of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (Figures 4A, B and 5B to 5E). ROS have been reported to regulate caspase activation in TRAIL-resistant human colon carcinoma cells . Perez-Cruz et al.  indicated that intracellular vitamin C can quench some of these ROS, reducing caspase-8 activation, similar to what we observed in the LO2 cells. However, Fas et al.  found that wogonin sensitizes resistant malignant cells to TRAIL by shifting levels of the TRAIL-induced free radical O2-, consistent with our results demonstrating the sensitization of K562 and HL-60 cells.
ROS levels have been found to be significantly higher in cancer cells than in normal cells, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase, catalase and SOD has been shown to be significantly lower in cancer patients than in controls . The higher ROS levels and lower antioxidant enzyme activities (Figures 3C to 3F) make the transient burst of H2O2 possible in K562 and HL-60 cells; however, because of the lower ROS levels and vigorous antioxidant system, the brief accumulation of H2O2 was not detected in LO2 cells (Figures 3G and 3I). The brief accumulation of H2O2 during O2- scavenging was involved in the sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis in K562 and HL-60 cells (Figures 5H to 5K), possibly exerting a direct effect on caspase-8 activation . The low H2O2 levels protected LO2 cells from sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis (Figures 7E to 7G). Normal T cells produced very little ROS, and therefore only a small shift in redox state was seen, which may explain why sTRAIL:FeSOD did not sensitize normal T cells to undergo apoptosis. Our studies reveal that sTRAIL:FeSOD reduces the level of intracellular O2-, with two results: the downregulation of p-Akt arising from a low level of O2- and the transitory accumulation of H2O2, both of which may increase the amount of available active caspase-8 . However, a low level of O2-, impairing caspase-8 activation , and stable mitochondria may inhibit apoptosis. Thus, we infer that the relative ratio of these opposing effects described above determines the sensitivity of a cell to sTRAIL:FeSOD and that this relative ratio may be associated with the cell type and the level of O2-. Without the accumulation of H2O2, the available activated caspase-8 was insufficient (Figures 5C and 7E to 7G). At the same time, caspase-9 activity was inhibited (Figures 4 and 5C), which means that the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway was interrupted. Thus, sTRAIL:FeSOD cannot sensitize LO2 cells to apoptosis when there is insufficient activated caspase-8 to excite the downstream apoptotic pathway in the absence of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. The induction of apoptosis in K562 and HL-60 cells implies that the net result of intracellular O2- scavenging by sTRAIL:FeSOD is the presence of a critical amount of activated caspase-8. Thus, in environments of low-level oxidative stress, the cellular context may influence the relative ratio of the opposing effects and subsequently determine whether this low level of oxidative stress favors apoptosis or survival.
Because of the effective protection against the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway mediated by the increased expression of Bcl-XL and the mutation of caspase-8, K562 and HL-60 cells exhibit strong resistance to chemotherapeutic agents [38, 39]. However, after treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, K562 and HL-60 cells undergoing apoptosis retained their ΔΨm (Figure 4), and we also failed to detect a difference in the expression level of Bcl-2, Bax, Bid or Bcl-XL (Figures 6A and 6B) or a change in the distribution of cytochrome c (Figure 4D). The unchanged pattern of cytochrome c localization may be associated with a decrease in ROS levels, leading to mitochondrial stability. Depressed caspase-9 expression did not suppress apoptosis, demonstrating that sTRAIL:FeSOD-induced apoptosis was independent of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in K562 and HL-60 cells (Figures 5A and 5B). Mohr et al.  indicated that high levels of MnSOD protect colorectal cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis by inhibition of Smac/DIABLO release. However, this effect may be limited to type II cells, in which death receptor-mediated apoptosis is dependent on mitochondria. In contrast, in the present study, treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD caused K562 and HL-60 cells to convert to type I cells and to apoptose independently of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, consistent with the effects of erythroid differentiation . Thus, mitochondrial hyperpolarization does not delay apoptosis when a critical amount of caspase-8 has been activated, which may be the mechanism that regulates type I cell apoptosis independently of the mitochondrial signaling pathway .
Death receptors are expressed in liver tissue as well as in isolated hepatocytes , and for this reason sTRAIL:FeSOD was able to permeate the cell membrane and reduce the oxidative stress in LO2 cells without causing cytotoxicity. Maintaining the balance of opposing effects is important when treating normal cells with sTRAIL:FeSOD, because an appropriate ROS level is extremely important for preserving vital cellular and biochemical functions. Our future work will focus on the task of estimating intracellular ROS production in an individual cell to determine a treatment dose that maintains ROS levels at an appropriate interval, killing cancer cells without inducing normal cell death. In light of the different sensitivities of different cell types to ROS and the hypersensitivity of tumor cells to decreased levels of ROS relative to normal cells, the ability to control TRAIL cytotoxicity through the regulation of intracellular ROS levels will be a breakthrough in the utilization of TRAIL. Undoubtedly, sTRAIL:FeSOD is a good potential therapeutic choice.
In conclusion, our research has shown that a cell-permeable fusion protein, sTRAIL:FeSOD, selectively sensitized K562 and HL-60 cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis but did not sensitize normal human hepatocytes (LO2 cells) or T cells. sTRAIL:FeSOD is a potent antioxidant that produces H2O2 during intracellular O2- scavenging and downregulates p-Akt and c-FLIPL. Thus, sTRAIL:FeSOD enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in leukemia cells and, at the same time, avoids the negative effects of high levels of ROS. After treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, the mitochondria were still intact, and the TRAIL-resistant K562 and HL-60 cells successfully converted into type I cells. In addition, the downregulation of c-FLIPL was not sufficient to sensitize LO2 to TRAIL-induced apoptosis without H2O2 accumulation. These data suggest that sTRAIL:FeSOD can serve as a promising pharmaceutical agent for the treatment of leukemia.
Reagents and antibodies
The fluorescent probes DHE, Rh123 and the peroxide-sensitive fluorophore DCFDA were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, Oregon, USA). The total caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp (OMe) fluoromethylketone) and the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Caspase-9, caspase-3 and caspase-8 fluorometric assay kits were obtained from BioVision (Palo Alto, California, USA). Rabbit p-Akt (Thr308) antibody; mouse Akt antibody; rabbit c-FLIPS and c-FLIPL antibodies; Bcl-XL, Bcl-2, Bax and Bid antibodies; caspase-9, caspase-3 and caspase-8 antibodies; and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat antirabbit antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, Massachusetts, USA), along with LY294002 (PI3K inhibitor). TRAIL, DR4 and DR5 antibodies and donkey antimouse immunoglobulin G-HRP were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). All of the remaining reagents were purchased from Sigma (Saint Louis, Missouri, USA).
Cell lines and culture conditions
The pUCm-T-TRAIL vector was kindly provided by Pro Liu (Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Science, Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). Escherichia coli DH5α [supE4 ΔlacU169 (80lacZΔM15) hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1], E. coli BL21 (DE3) (hsdS gal (λcIts857 ind1 Sam7 nin5 lacUV5-T7 gene 1)), pET-28a(+) vector, pUCm-T vector and pET22-FeSOD vector were available at our institute. E. coli DH5α and E. coli BL21 (DE3) were maintained at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. K562, HL-60 and LO2 cells were available in our laboratory and cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin). Human peripheral T cells were prepared as described previously . T cells were activated with 1 μg/ml polyhydroxyalkanoate for 20 hours, washed three times and then cultured for an additional 5 days in the presence of 25 U/ml interleukin 2. Transfections of K562, HL-60 and LO2 cells were performed with the expression vectors pcDNA3-c-FLIPL, caspase-8 and caspase-9 small interfering RNA (siRNA), catalase siRNA or control siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using the Attractene transfection reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Production, purification and immunoblot analyses of sTRAIL and sTRAIL:FeSOD
A DNA fragment encoding the extracellular domain of human TRAIL (sTRAIL; 114 to 281 aa) was amplified from the pUCm-T-TRAIL vector with the primers sTRAIL-NcoI (5'-CATGCCATGGTGAGAGAAAGAGGTCCTCAGAGAGTAG-3') and sTRAIL-SalI (5'-ACGCGTCGACTCCGCCTCCACCGCCAACTAAAAAGGCC-3') and directionally inserted into pET28a(+) plasmid to form pET28-sTRAIL using the unique NcoI and SalI restriction enzyme sites. The FeSOD fragment was amplified from the pET22-FeSOD vector, polymerase chain reaction-amplified with FeSOD-SalI (5'-ACGCGTCGACTCATTTGTACAGCTCCCACTACCCT-3') and FeSOD-NotI (5'-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCAGCTTTGGCCAAGTTTTC-3') primers and cloned in frame with the unique SalI and NotI restriction enzymes, yielding plasmid pET28-sTRAIL:FeSOD. Nucleotide sequences of the insert regions within these constructs were independently verified by automated DNA sequencing.
E. coli BL-21 DE3 (pLys) were transformed with pET28-sTRAIL and then induced in the presence of 0.8 mM IPTG in 1 liter of LB culture medium at 27°C for 3 hours . Bacterial pellets were then collected by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Pellets were sonicated and lysed in Triton X-100 lysis buffer (10 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride) for 30 minutes on ice. The lysis supernatant was then cleared by centrifugation and poured onto a column with 5 ml of nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid Superflow resin (Qiagen), and the packed resin was washed with buffer consisting of imidazole gradient concentrations (0 to 500 mM). The sTRAIL:FeSOD fusion protein was expressed at 37°C and lysed from pET28-sTRAIL:FeSOD as described above. The achieved sedimentation (sTRAIL:FeSOD fusion protein) was then dissolved in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 8 M urea) overnight. The lysate was purified as described above. After purification, the denatured protein was renatured in buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 M L-arginine, 0.5 mM GSH, 0.5 mM L-Glutathione oxidized, 10% glycerol, 10 μM Fe3+, 10 μM Zn2+) consisting of a gradient of urea concentrations (0 to 8 M) at 10°C. The renatured proteins were collected and flowed over a Sephadex G-100 column for gel filtration chromatography. By disordering the amino acid sequence in the conserved region (69 to 84 aa, 120 to 132 aa and 162 to 169 aa) of FeSOD, we also produced a mutant form of fused protein (sTRAIL:mFeSOD) that was deficient in its enzymatic activity. The expression of sTRAIL, sTRAIL:FeSOD and sTRAIL:mFeSOD was assessed by Western blot analysis. The TRAIL-induced apoptosis activity of sTRAIL, sTRAIL:FeSOD and sTRAIL:mFeSOD was assayed by treating the TRAIL-sensitive LO2 cells in hypertonic medium containing sucrose (0.25 M), conditions that inhibited the endocytosis of TRAIL, eliminating the effect of FeSOD . The SOD activity of purified sTRAIL:FeSOD was determined using the xanthine/xanthine oxidase system. sTRAIL:mFeSOD was used as control to analyze the cellular effects of sTRAIL:FeSOD.
To identify early apoptotic changes, cells were seeded in six-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well) and incubated for 8 hours in the presence of FeSOD, sTRAIL, sTRAIL:FeSOD or sTRAIL:mFeSOD. Cells were collected at 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C. After being washed, the cells were then stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-annexin V antibody and PI, followed by flow cytometric analysis (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). The results are presented as the percentage of apoptosis. For each sample, 10,000 events were acquired in each group. Experiments were performed three separate times for each cell line.
Preparation of FITC-labeled sTRAIL:FeSOD conjugate
By labeling with FITC, we could trace the permeation process of sTRAIL:FeSOD through the cell membrane. sTRAIL:FeSOD (10 mg) was dissolved in 5 ml of 500 mM carbonate buffer (pH 8.5) without sodium azide. Ten milligrams of FITC were dissolved in 1 ml of anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide immediately before use, and then 50 μl of FITC were added to the dissolved sample. The tube was wrapped in foil and then incubated and rotated at room temperature for 2 hours. The labeled sTRAIL:FeSOD was desalted with a Sephadex G-25 column to remove unreacted FITC. The fluorescence intensity of sample was measured by using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. FeSOD and sTRAIL:mFeSOD were treated as described above. No difference was observed in the efficiency of FITC-labeled sTRAIL:FeSOD compared with unlabeled protein in terms of inducing apoptosis in LO2 cells (data not shown).
Determination of sTRAIL:FeSOD internalization by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry
Prepared K562 cells were washed extensively with PBS and incubated in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5 μg/ml FITC-conjugated sTRAIL:FeSOD for 5, 15 or 30 minutes at 37°C. After internalization, following three washes with PBS to remove unbound protein and an acid wash (0.2 M NaCl, 0.2 M acetic acid) to strip the surface-associated ligand, intracellular FITC was observed by LSCM (LSM510; Carl Zeiss, Jene, Germany), and quantitative data were analyzed by using flow cytometry. LO2 cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium containing hyperosmotic sucrose (0.25 M)  and 5 μg/ml FITC-conjugated sTRAIL:FeSOD and then counterstained with the DNA dye Hoechst 33342 (Sigma).
Cellular oxidative stress assay by flow cytometry
After incubation with 1000 ng/ml sTRAIL:FeSOD in fresh culture medium for the indicated amount of time, cells were washed and incubated with 20 μM dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR123) (for H2O2), 50 μM 2,3-Naphthalenedicarboxaldehyde (NDA) (for GSH), 20 μM DHE (for O2-) or 5 μM DCFDA (for total ROS) at 37°C for 30 minutes. The cells were then washed three times with probe-free phosphate buffer. The fluorescence intensity was measured by flow cytometry.
Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential
Cells were precultured in a 24-well plate at a concentration of 0.5 × 106 cells/well. Subsequently, cells were treated with 1,000 ng/ml sTRAIL:FeSOD, 500 ng/ml rTRAIL or 500 ng/ml FeSOD for 6 hours or were left untreated as controls. After treatment with sTRAIL:FeSOD, cells were harvested and washed with prewarmed PBS. The cells were then incubated with 10 μM Rh123 or 1 μg/ml JC-1 at 37°C for 30 minutes, washed and subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry.
Caspase activity assay
Prepared cells (1 × 106/ml) were treated for 6 hours with 1,000 ng/ml sTRAIL:FeSOD, 500 ng/ml rTRAIL or 500 ng/ml FeSOD and then lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (Biovision) for 10 minutes. After centrifugation for 10 minutes at 15,000 × g, cell lysates were tested for protease activity by the addition of reaction buffer (containing 10 mM DTT) and caspase-specific peptides conjugated to the fluorescence AFC (7-amino-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin). Cleavage of the peptide by caspase releases the chromophore, which was quantified using a fluorometer at 505 nm.
Western blot analysis
Treated cells were collected, washed in PBS and then lysed with lysis buffer on ice. Approximately 20 μg of lysed protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose blotting membrane, blocked for 1.5 hours in blocking buffer (5% bovine serum albumin solution and 0.1% Tween 20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBST)). After three washes in TBST, membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies in blocking buffer overnight. After three washing steps in TBST, the blots were subjected to appropriate secondary antibodies for 1.5 hours in blocking buffer. After two washes in TBST for 30 minutes, proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence detection.
This work was supported by grant 30900760 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
- Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, Din WS, Huang CP, Nicholl JK, Sutherland GR, Smith TD, Rauch C, Smith CA, Goodwin RG: Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity. 1995, 3: 673-682. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90057-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang S: The promise of cancer therapeutics targeting the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and TRAIL receptor pathway. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 6207-6215. 10.1038/onc.2008.298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, Leung S, Lawrence DA, Marsters SA, Blackie C, Chang L, McMurtrey AE, Hebert A, DeForge L, Koumenis IL, Lewis D, Harris L, Bussiere J, Koeppen H, Shahrokh Z, Schwall RH: Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. J Clin Invest. 1999, 104: 155-162. 10.1172/JCI6926.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, Gliniak B, Griffith TS, Kubin M, Chin W, Jones J, Woodward A, Le T, Smith C, Smolak P, Goodwin RG, Rauch CT, Schuh JC, Lynch DH: Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 157-163. 10.1038/5517.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jo M, Kim TH, Seol DW, Esplen JE, Dorko K, Billiar TR, Strom SC: Apoptosis induced in normal human hepatocytes by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 564-567. 10.1038/75045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leverkus M, Neumann M, Mengling T, Rauch CT, Brocker EB, Krammer PH, Walczak H: Regulation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand sensitivity in primary and transformed human keratinocytes. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 553-559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Itoh M, Noutomi T, Toyota H, Mizuguchi J: Etoposide-mediated sensitization of squamous cell carcinoma cells to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced loss in mitochondrial membrane potential. Oral Oncol. 2003, 39: 269-276. 10.1016/S1368-8375(02)00114-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dida F, Li Y, Iwao A, Deguchi T, Azuma E, Komada Y: Resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis caused by constitutional phosphorylation of Akt and PTEN in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Exp Hematol. 2008, 36: 1343-1353. 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Zhang B: TRAIL resistance of breast cancer cells is associated with constitutive endocytosis of death receptors 4 and 5. Mol Cancer Res. 2008, 6: 1861-1871. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fas SC, Baumann S, Zhu JY, Giaisi M, Treiber MK, Mahlknecht U, Krammer PH, Li-Weber M: Wogonin sensitizes resistant malignant cells to TNFα- and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Blood. 2006, 108: 3700-3706. 10.1182/blood-2006-03-011973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belyanskaya LL, Marti TM, Hopkins-Donaldson S, Kurtz S, Felley-Bosco E, Stahel RA: Human agonistic TRAIL receptor antibodies Mapatumumab and Lexatumumab induce apoptosis in malignant mesothelioma and act synergistically with cisplatin. Mol Cancer. 2007, 6: 66-10.1186/1476-4598-6-66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meurette O, Fontaine A, Rebillard A, Le Moigne G, Lamy T, Lagadic-Gossmann D, Dimanche-Boitrel MT: Cytotoxicity of TRAIL/anticancer drug combinations in human normal cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1090: 209-216. 10.1196/annals.1378.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koschny R, Walczak H, Ganten TM: The promise of TRAIL: potential and risks of a novel anticancer therapy. J Mol Med. 2007, 85: 923-935. 10.1007/s00109-007-0194-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bremer E, Samplonius DF, van Genne L, Dijkstra MH, Kroesen BJ, de Leij LF, Helfrich W: Simultaneous inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and enhanced activation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor-mediated apoptosis induction by an scFv:sTRAIL fusion protein with specificity for human EGFR. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 10025-10033. 10.1074/jbc.M413673200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, Housman DE: p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell. 1993, 74: 957-967. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90719-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang J, Chen J, Zhang D, Da W, Ou Y: Synergistic killing of human leukemia cells by antioxidants and trichostatin A. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004, 54: 537-545. 10.1007/s00280-004-0845-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behrend L, Mohr A, Dick T, Zwacka RM: Manganese superoxide dismutase induces p53-dependent senescence in colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 7758-7769. 10.1128/MCB.25.17.7758-7769.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jubeh TT, Antler S, Haupt S, Barenholz Y, Rubinstein A: Local prevention of oxidative stress in the intestinal epithelium of the rat by adhesive liposomes of superoxide dismutase and tempamine. Mol Pharm. 2005, 2: 2-11. 10.1021/mp0499095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu M, Gong X, Lu Y, Guo J, Wang C, Pan Y: Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a cell-permeable superoxide dismutase targeted to lung adenocarcinoma cells: inhibition cell proliferation through the Akt/p27kip1 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 13620-13627. 10.1074/jbc.M600523200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panka DJ, Mano T, Suhara T, Walsh K, Mier JW: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt activity regulates c-FLIP expression in tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 6893-6896. 10.1074/jbc.C000569200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Chen W, Zeng W, Bai L, Tesfaigzi Y, Belinsky SA, Lin Y: Akt-mediated eminent expression of c-FLIP and Mcl-1 confers acquired resistance to TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity to lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 1156-1163. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2183.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shrader M, Pino MS, Lashinger L, Bar-Eli M, Adam L, Dinney CP, McConkey DJ: Gefitinib reverses TRAIL resistance in human bladder cancer cell lines via inhibition of AKT-mediated X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein expression. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 1430-1435. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin D, Salinas M, Fujita N, Tsuruo T, Cuadrado A: Ceramide and reactive oxygen species generated by H2O2 induce caspase-3-independent degradation of Akt/protein kinase B. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 42943-42952. 10.1074/jbc.M201070200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohlhaas SL, Craxton A, Sun XM, Pinkoski MJ, Cohen GM: Receptor-mediated endocytosis is not required for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 12831-12841. 10.1074/jbc.M700438200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Randhawa VK, Patel N, Hayashi M, Klip A: Hyperosmolarity reduces GLUT4 endocytosis and increases its exocytosis from a VAMP2-independent pool in L6 muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 22883-22891. 10.1074/jbc.M010143200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffith TS, Lynch DH: TRAIL: a molecule with multiple receptors and control mechanisms. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998, 10: 559-563. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80224-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lum JJ, Schnepple DJ, Badley AD: Acquired T-cell sensitivity to TRAIL mediated killing during HIV infection is regulated by CXCR4-gp120 interactions. AIDS. 2005, 19: 1125-1133. 10.1097/01.aids.0000176212.16205.23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamata H, Hirata H: Redox regulation of cellular signalling. Cell Signal. 1999, 11: 1-14. 10.1016/S0898-6568(98)00037-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matysiak M, Jurewicz A, Jaskolski D, Selmaj K: TRAIL induces death of human oligodendrocytes isolated from adult brain. Brain. 2002, 125: 2469-2480. 10.1093/brain/awf254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sundaresan M, Yu ZX, Ferrans VJ, Irani K, Finkel T: Requirement for generation of H2O2 for platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction. Science. 1995, 270: 296-299. 10.1126/science.270.5234.296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Algeciras-Schimnich A, Pietras EM, Barnhart BC, Legembre P, Vijayan S, Holbeck SL, Peter ME: Two CD95 tumor classes with different sensitivities to antitumor drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 11445-11450. 10.1073/pnas.2034995100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samuels Y, Diaz LA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Cummins JM, Delong L, Cheong I, Rago C, Huso DL, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE: Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 561-573. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnstone RW, Frew AJ, Smyth MJ: The TRAIL apoptotic pathway in cancer onset, progression and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 782-798. 10.1038/nrc2465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Cruz I, Carcamo JM, Golde DW: Vitamin C inhibits FAS-induced apoptosis in monocytes and U937 cells. Blood. 2003, 102: 336-343. 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani G, Maccio A, Madeddu C, Mura L, Gramignano G, Lusso MR, Massa E, Mocci M, Serpe R: Antioxidant agents are effective in inducing lymphocyte progression through cell cycle in advanced cancer patients: assessment of the most important laboratory indexes of cachexia and oxidative stress. J Mol Med. 2003, 81: 664-673. 10.1007/s00109-003-0476-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Cruz I, Carcamo JM, Golde DW: Caspase-8 dependent TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer cell lines is inhibited by vitamin C and catalase. Apoptosis. 2007, 12: 225-234. 10.1007/s10495-006-0475-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geserick P, Drewniok C, Hupe M, Haas TL, Diessenbacher P, Sprick MR, Schon MP, Henkler F, Gollnick H, Walczak H, Leverkus M: Suppression of cFLIP is sufficient to sensitize human melanoma cells to TRAIL- and CD95L-mediated apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 3211-3220. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGahon A, Bissonnette R, Schmitt M, Cotter KM, Green DR, Cotter TG: BCR-ABL maintains resistance of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells to apoptotic cell death. Blood. 1994, 83: 1179-1187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng J, Hylander BL, Baer MR, Chen X, Repasky EA: Multiple mechanisms underlie resistance of leukemia cells to Apo2 ligand/TRAIL. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 1844-1853. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohr A, Büneker C, Gough RP, Zwacka RM: MnSOD protects colorectal cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis by inhibition of Smac/DIABLO release. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 763-774. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210673.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hietakangas V, Poukkula M, Heiskanen KM, Karvinen JT, Sistonen L, Eriksson JE: Erythroid differentiation sensitizes K562 leukemia cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by downregulation of c-FLIP. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 1278-1291. 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1278-1291.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klas C, Debatin KM, Jonker RR, Krammer PH: Activation interferes with the APO-1 pathway in mature human T cells. Int Immunol. 1993, 5: 625-630. 10.1093/intimm/5.6.625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harper N, MacFarlane M: Recombinant TRAIL and TRAIL receptor analysis. Methods Enzymol. 2008, 446: 293-313. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrieu N, Salvayre R, Jaffrézou JP, Levade T: Low temperatures and hypertonicity do not block cytokine-induced stimulation of the sphingomyelin pathway but inhibit nuclear factor-κB activation. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 24518-24524. 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24518.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.